Goal
Plan six ability scores with a transparent 27-point cost table, remaining budget, and derived modifiers.
Worldwide context
Saved once here, used across the site.
Currency changes display only. Country selection guides tax input; no tax rate is guessed.
Plan six ability scores with a transparent 27-point cost table, remaining budget, and derived modifiers.
Points spent = sum of the score costs {8:0, 9:1, 10:2, 11:3, 12:4, 13:5, 14:7, 15:9}; points remaining = 27 − points spent; modifier = floor((score − 10) ÷ 2).A clearer path to an answer
This page keeps the calculation transparent: define the goal, enter the matching values, inspect the method, and decide what the result means in your situation.
Plan six ability scores with a transparent 27-point cost table, remaining budget, and derived modifiers.
Strength · Dexterity · Constitution · Intelligence · Wisdom · Charisma
Points spent = sum of the score costs {8:0, 9:1, 10:2, 11:3, 12:4, 13:5, 14:7, 15:9}; points remaining = 27 − points spent; modifier = floor((score − 10) ÷ 2).
Calculate, review the assumptions below, then compare a related tool when the decision needs more context.
Plan six ability scores with a transparent 27-point cost table, remaining budget, and derived modifiers.
Open the Ability Score Point-Buy Planner pageMore education tools
Download PDFDownload Word (.doc)
Enter your values above and choose Calculate to see the result here.
Calculation map
Points spent = sum of the score costs {8:0, 9:1, 10:2, 11:3, 12:4, 13:5, 14:7, 15:9}; points remaining = 27 − points spent; modifier = floor((score − 10) ÷ 2).
Bounded, transparent calculation
Your recent runs stay in this browser session only.
Formula: Points spent = sum of the score costs {8:0, 9:1, 10:2, 11:3, 12:4, 13:5, 14:7, 15:9}; points remaining = 27 − points spent; modifier = floor((score − 10) ÷ 2).
This planner applies the displayed 27-point, 8–15 cost table to six entered ability scores. It reports the cost of the spread, the remaining budget, the raw-score total, the modifier total, and whether the spread stays within the selected budget.
Worked example: 9 + 7 + 5 + 4 + 2 + 0 = 27 points spent, with 0 remaining; modifiers are +2, +2, +1, +1, +0, and −1.
The displayed limits are checked before the handler runs. Model-specific domain checks may also reject impossible or non-finite inputs.
Methodology: This calculator follows the WorldCalculate input, formula, precision, and boundary policy. Read the official methodology.
Calculator usage statistics
This section counts anonymous successful Calculate submissions, not unique visitors. Counts and top tools appear only when trusted aggregate data is available; country analysis is shown only under the same condition and reporting threshold.
Answer-first guide
Plan six ability scores with a transparent 27-point cost table, remaining budget, and derived modifiers. Start with one clearly defined goal, enter values in the units shown, and keep the result attached to the assumptions below.
This tool is useful when your question includes point buy calculator, ability score point buy, 27 point buy. It returns the outputs declared in the calculator contract rather than a live quote, approval, diagnosis, or professional sign-off.
Strength · Dexterity · Constitution · Intelligence · Wisdom · Charisma. Keep the same time period, unit system, and currency wherever the form requires comparable values.
Run the worked example first, compare its output with the page's example, then change one input at a time. This makes an unexpected result easier to trace to a unit, boundary, or assumption.
Need a wider view? Browse Education Calculators or compare the related tools below. The WorldCalculate methodology explains how formulas, examples, limits, and revisions are reviewed.
Points spent = sum of the score costs {8:0, 9:1, 10:2, 11:3, 12:4, 13:5, 14:7, 15:9}; points remaining = 27 − points spent; modifier = floor((score − 10) ÷ 2).
This planner applies the displayed 27-point, 8–15 cost table to six entered ability scores. It reports the cost of the spread, the remaining budget, the raw-score total, the modifier total, and whether the spread stays within the selected budget.
9 + 7 + 5 + 4 + 2 + 0 = 27 points spent, with 0 remaining; modifiers are +2, +2, +1, +1, +0, and −1.
Context and background
Grades, GPA, and reading-time tools combine weighted components, credits, scores, pages, or rates. The result follows the convention and inputs you provide.
Educational measurement often uses weighted averages to represent unequal tasks or credits. Institutions can define their own grading policies, so the page keeps its mapping and scope explicit.
Research and review
Researched by Hassan ALRowaie, Founder and editorial researcher at WorldCalculate.
This guide follows the live calculator's declared inputs, formula, worked example, assumptions, validation boundaries, and source-backed methodology. The review date describes editorial review of the calculator explanation; it is not a promise that external facts or rates remain current.
A point-buy planner turns a fixed pool into a deliberate spread of ability scores. This WorldCalculate page uses the familiar 27-point, eight-through-fifteen cost table as a transparent example: each of six entered scores has a published cost, the costs are added, and the remaining budget is shown. It also derives the ordinary modifier from each raw score. The planner does not decide a character build, add later bonuses, or silently assume a particular table's house rules.
Point buy replaces a random generation step with a bounded allocation problem. Every score begins at the lowest allowed value in the selected table, and raising a score consumes points. Early increases are inexpensive, while the highest values cost more. The result is a spread that can be balanced, specialized, or somewhere between those extremes while staying within a known budget.
The calculator separates three ideas that are often mixed together: the raw score, its cost, and its later modifier. A raw score of 14 costs seven points in this table, while its modifier is +2. Neither number is the same as a bonus added by a later rule. Keeping the layers separate prevents an otherwise tidy character sheet from hiding an arithmetic mistake.
The planner uses these costs: 8 costs 0, 9 costs 1, 10 costs 2, 11 costs 3, 12 costs 4, 13 costs 5, 14 costs 7, and 15 costs 9. The values are not a linear price per point. Moving from 13 to 14 costs two additional points, while moving from 14 to 15 costs two additional points as well, after the earlier costs have already been paid.
Because the table is piecewise, estimating the total by adding score values is wrong. A spread whose raw scores add to 72 can consume a different budget from another spread that also adds to 72. Always apply the cost to each score first, then add the costs. The result panel keeps the budget logic explicit.
Enter one whole number for Strength, Dexterity, Constitution, Intelligence, Wisdom, and Charisma. The fields are limited to eight through fifteen so an accidental later bonus is not mistaken for a starting point-buy score. If a rulebook uses a different range or a custom table, the page should be treated as an educational reference rather than a complete implementation of that variant.
The order of the six fields does not change the budget. It does change the character concept because the labels attach scores to abilities. Decide the intended role and table rules outside the arithmetic, then enter the resulting spread. The calculator does not rank the abilities or tell a player which one is most important.
The page sums the six costs and subtracts that total from 27. A result of zero means the full budget is used. A positive result means points are unspent, which can be valid if the table permits it. A negative result means the entered spread exceeds the displayed budget and should be revised before it is used.
Do not hide an over-budget spread by truncating the remaining value at zero. The negative result is useful evidence that the plan does not fit. It also makes comparison easier: if two drafts are both valid, their remaining points show whether one could be raised under the same rules.
The ordinary modifier calculation is floor((score − 10) ÷ 2). Scores 8 and 9 therefore produce −1, scores 10 and 11 produce +0, scores 12 and 13 produce +1, and scores 14 and 15 produce +2. The floor operation matters for odd scores below ten; rounding toward zero would produce the wrong modifier for an eight or nine.
Later bonuses can change a final ability score and modifier in a specific game, but the point-buy worksheet stops before those changes. If a score of 15 receives a later +2, record the source of that adjustment on the character sheet. Do not enter 17 into this starting-score field because it would skip the point-buy contract.
A balanced spread keeps several abilities close together. A specialized spread pays for one or more high scores and accepts lower scores elsewhere. Both can be valid under a 27-point table. The useful question is not which shape is universally best; it is whether the spread fits the intended role, the group's expectations, and the actual rules in use.
Compare spreads by their costs and modifiers, not only by the six-score total. A one-point change in a raw score may do nothing to the modifier while still consuming a budget point. Conversely, crossing an even boundary can change the modifier and the practical result of a later roll. The calculator shows both layers so the tradeoff can be discussed.
Consider 15, 14, 13, 12, 10, and 8. Their costs are 9, 7, 5, 4, 2, and 0. The total is 27, so the remaining budget is zero. The raw-score total is 72. Applying floor((score − 10) ÷ 2) gives +2, +2, +1, +1, +0, and −1.
The example is a calculation check, not a recommendation. A different assignment of the same values changes which ability receives the higher modifier but not the point cost. A later rule may also change the final scores. Preserve the source version of the table when saving an example because rulebooks and organized play policies can differ.
Point-buy tables are rules data, not a universal mathematical law. Different editions, systems, campaigns, or house rules can use another pool, another minimum, a different maximum, or another cost curve. A result is only valid relative to the table named in the assumptions. This page deliberately displays its table instead of pretending that every game uses the same one.
If a group allows a custom budget, use a separate reviewed calculation contract rather than editing one number in a saved result and forgetting the change. A good record states the pool, minimum, maximum, cost schedule, source version, and whether later bonuses are included.
The most common mistake is adding the six scores instead of their costs. Another is paying the cost of a final score after bonuses rather than the starting score. A third is mixing tables from different editions. A fourth is using a score below eight or above fifteen because it looks like a normal finished character score.
Check the result by recalculating each field independently. Write the score and cost as pairs, add the costs, and compare the sum with the page. Then calculate modifiers from the raw scores. This two-pass check is quick and catches most errors without requiring a complex build tool.
The tool does not evaluate a class, role, party composition, encounter balance, personality, fun, or story. It does not advise a player to optimize one ability or treat a low ability as a failure. Those decisions are creative and social, not consequences of a budget arithmetic rule.
It also does not apply armor, spell, weapon, skill, saving-throw, or feature rules. Those calculations depend on the chosen game and character details. Use the planner as a clean starting layer and carry the source table forward into the full character record.
Why does 14 cost 7? Because that is the selected table's published cost, not a linear score. Can I leave points unused? The page reports unused points; whether they are allowed is a table rule. Does the total score equal the budget? No. The score total and cost total answer different questions.
Are modifiers included in the budget? No; modifiers are derived after the raw scores. Can I add later bonuses in the fields? Not if they would exceed the displayed starting range. What should I write down? Pool, table, six raw scores, six costs, remaining budget, and later adjustments separately.
Use the planner to test a few spreads, then verify the chosen table with the organizer or rulebook. A good result is not just a number; it includes the source convention and the decision about how those scores fit the character. Keep the raw values available so later bonuses can be audited.
WorldCalculate provides the cost arithmetic and modifier calculation in a neutral way. The player and table decide what is appropriate for the game being played.
Plan six ability scores with a transparent 27-point cost table, remaining budget, and derived modifiers.
Points spent = sum of the score costs {8:0, 9:1, 10:2, 11:3, 12:4, 13:5, 14:7, 15:9}; points remaining = 27 − points spent; modifier = floor((score − 10) ÷ 2). This planner applies the displayed 27-point, 8–15 cost table to six entered ability scores. It reports the cost of the spread, the remaining budget, the raw-score total, the modifier total, and whether the spread stays within the selected budget.
Enter Strength, Dexterity, Constitution, Intelligence, Wisdom, Charisma, then choose Calculate.
The six scores use the displayed 27-point cost table. Scores are whole numbers from 8 through 15 before later bonuses or penalties. No ancestry, species, background, feat, level, class, or house-rule adjustment is applied. The modifier uses floor((score − 10) ÷ 2) for the entered score. A valid budget is treated as 27 points or fewer; unused points are allowed for planning. The tool is a generic game-planning worksheet and does not choose a particular ruleset for the visitor.
This calculator is part of the WorldCalculate library. Its formula, example, assumptions, input bounds, and output formatting follow the official methodology.
These WorldCalculate collections connect this tool with related questions while keeping each calculation separate and transparent.